The Topics 1. Is the criminal justice system really making "remarkable progress in its ability to deter crime?" 2. Are there criminal treatment strategies that work? 3. Is crime a product of various social pathologies? 4. Is the criminal justice system unfair to African-Americans or other minorities? 5. Three Strikes and You're Out: Unexpected Consequences.
Related Articles in this Issue U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Calls Guidelines "Political Sentencing." Mike McCarty '90: Breaking the Cycle of Violence Cleo Washington '85: Fighting "Vindictive Justice" Todd Shellenbarger '87: Witness for the Prosecution? A Judge's Defining MomentSteve Heimann '77 Defending Church Burners and TaxpayersSteve Riggs '81 The System's Fatal FlawJim Bond '64
|
|
|
Law & Order in
America: |
||
In early January, President Clinton announced statistics revealing a 5% decrease in the number of criminal acts across the country for 1998the sixth consecutive decrease since 1991and proclaimed "remarkable progress" in the effort to reduce crime. The President failed to mention that the decrease in crime coincides with six years of almost-unprecedented economic growth, a relative decline in the youth population often responsible for a large number of criminal acts, and a skyrocketing prison population. Wabash Magazine wondered:
To address this question and other issues facing America's criminal justice system, we linked up via e-mail a group of Wabash alumni with experience in the system for an online forum. Moderated by Dean of the University of Seattle Law School Jim Bond '64,
the panel included judges, a prosecutor, law-enforcement officers, a probation
officer, and a corrections official, all bringing different perspectives
to the complex problems of crime in America. The topics discussed are listed on the left. To see what the panelists said, click on Read the responses. |
|
|